Henry Sidgwick’s Practical Ethics: A Defense
نویسندگان
چکیده
Henry Sidgwick’s Practical Ethics offers a novel approach to practical moral issues. In this article, I defend Sidgwick’s approach against recent objections advanced by Sissela Bok, Karen Hanson, Michael S. Pritchard, and Michael Davis. In the first section, I provide some context within which to situate Sidgwick’s view. In the second, I outline the main features of Sidgwick’s methodology and the powerful rationale that lies behind it. I emphasize elements of the view that help to defend it, noting some affinities it has with those of the later Rawls. In the third section, I indicate how it promises to help alleviate some difficulties facing modern practical ethics. In the fourth, I respond to Bok’s objections. I argue that her own work on practical ethics has some similarities to Sidgwick’s which should make them friends, not enemies. In the fifth section, I respond to Hanson, Pritchard and Davis.
منابع مشابه
Deontology – Born and Kept in Servitude by Utilitarianism
The distinction between teleology and deontology is today almost universally accepted within practical philosophy, but deontology is and has from the beginning been subordinate to utilitarianism. ‘Deontology’ was constructed by Bentham to signify the art and science of private morality within a utilitarian worldview. The classical distinction was constructed by Broad as a refinement of Sidgwick...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Strategic Human Resource Managements and Services Innovation; Considering the Role of Employees\' Professional Ethics
Background: Defense organizations need to implement the services innovation practices in todaychr('39')s dynamic and changing environment. Defense organizations also need strategic human resource managements and employees chr('39') professional ethics to proceed and move towards service innovation. Accordingly, the present study has been conducted to investigate the relationship between strateg...
متن کاملTwo Dualisms of Practical Reason
Dualism is one way to put the traditional dualism of practical reason, i.e., that practical reason can never declare that there is greater overall reason to conform to moral, or prudential, requirements in a case of conflict between our own self-interest and our obligations to others.1 In this paper, I distinguish two methods by which one might accept Dualism. First, I discuss a substantive dua...
متن کاملModerate Morality: An Interest-Based Contractarian Defense & its Applied Result in the Political Ethics of International Relations
What is morality’s scope? Should all our actions be evaluated morally? Is it necessary to be causally responsible for harm to have a responsibility to reduce it? Is there a morally relevant distinction between those consequences of our actions which we intend or do and those which we foresee but do not intend or allow but do not do? Is helping others a matter of supererogation (i.e. beyond the ...
متن کاملReligious and Ethics in Relation to secular Ethics from Allameh Tabatabai's Viewpoint
In an innovative categorization, Allameh Tabatabai has divided ethical schools into four major including those of: predecessor prophets, Quran, Greek philosophers, and relativism (the followers of evolution theory). The two former schools are known as elements of religious ethics and the latter ones as secular by Allameh Tabatabai. According to his division and evaluation of the ethical schools...
متن کامل